Unmasking 9/11 Censors

Neutralizing the 9/11 Censors

Have you realized that much of the evil that has been inflicted on the human community comes from our Platonic Masters? Do you know that the key to leaving our global Platonic theater is to neutralize the 9/11 censors with understanding, compassion, and forgiveness? Are you ready to do just that?

If so, read on. Otherwise, kindly come back after becoming cognizant of the advanced 9/11 class.

The 9/11 censors have performed evil activities. They have been promoting the 9/11 myth in spite of overwhelming and obvious evidence that the 9/11 terror attacks were a poorly covered false flag operation. In the process, each of them has implicitly accepted, at her/his individual level, partial responsibility for the persisting success of 9/11 and the large-scale evil it has inflicted upon her/his fellow humans, starting with the open-ended wars 9/11 has been the pretext for.

An immediate question is that of the censors' moral accountability. This is where a parallel with some commonly vilified individuals is in order. It so happens that in the West, and particularly in the United States, the Nazi concentration camp guard has earned a viscerally evil reputation. Perhaps this is why a basic practical philosophy exercise invites students to judge her/his morality and devise a line of action from the perspective of the inmates (s)he guards. The reader is hereby invited to draw a comparison between the professional Nazi goons and the professional 9/11 goons:

The Evil Nazi Concentration Camp Guard...	The Evil 9/11 Censor...
Many students' gut reaction is to vent anger at the Nazi concentration camp guard, summarily condemn her/his evil actions, and devise retaliatory and punitive measures, including criminal charges once the Nazi evil is over.	Many 9/11 truth-seekers' gut reaction is to vent anger at the 9/11 censor, summarily condemn her/his evil actions, and devise retaliatory and punitive measures, including criminal charges once the 9/11 evil is over.
Once this emotional flare-up has cooled down, if the students brainstorm on the Nazi concentration camp guard's motivations, they quickly come up with compelling circumstances to revise their initial judgment. A sample follows	Once this emotional flare-up has cooled down, if 9/11 truth-seekers brainstorm on the 9/11censor's motivations, they will quickly come up with compelling circumstances to revise their initial judgment. A sample follows.
The Nazi concentration camp guard projects an image of invincible power and wanton cruelty, but (s)he is merely doing the bidding of the Nazi dignitaries.	The 9/11 censor projects an image of invincible power and wanton cruelty, but (s)he is merely doing the bidding of the Platonic Masters.
The Nazi concentration camp guard is only a pawn in a much bigger game of evil. Whatever is done to her/him ought to be done with the final objective in mind: defang the Nazi evil.	The 9/11 censor is only a pawn in a much bigger game of evil. Whatever is done to her/him ought to be done with the final objective in mind: get the human community out of the global Platonic theater.
The Nazi concentration camp guard may believe the regime's propaganda according to which the people (s)he is evil to are subhuman, dangerous, or evil.	The 9/11 censor may believe the Platonic Masters' propaganda according to which the people (s)he is evil to are subhuman, dangerous, or evil.
The Nazi concentration camp guard may live under the influence of a psychopathology that makes her/him evil, in which case not doing evil would go against her/his nature.	The 9/11 censor may live under the influence of a psychopathology that makes her/him evil, in which case not doing evil would go against her/his nature.
Information, food, money and other supplies are scarce. The Nazi concentration camp guard has the privilege of diverting some away from the inmates for her/his own needs. His/her self-interest call her/him to do nothing that could jeopardize her/his social status.	Information, food, money and other supplies are scarce. The 9/11 censor has the privilege of diverting some away from the public for her/his own needs. His/her self-interest call her/him to do nothing that could jeopardize her/his social status.
The Nazi concentration camp guard may have reasons to believe that refusing to do evil would elicit retaliation. Perhaps (s)he knows of a fellow guard who declined to treat inmates cruelly on one occasion and "coincidentally" got sent to the Russian front.	The 9/11 censor may have reasons to believe that refusing to do evil would elicit retaliation. Perhaps (s)he knows of a fellow censor who declined to counter 9/11 truth-seeking on one occasion and "coincidentally" got sidetracked in her/his career.
The Nazi concentration camp guard may believe that should (s)he treat the inmates more humanely, her/his fellow guards will notice, get harsher on them, and denounce her/him to their superiors.	The 9/11 censor may believe that should (s)he tone down her/his dismissal of 9/11 Truth, her/his fellow censors will notice, get harsher on 9/11 Truth, and denounce her/him to their plumbers.
Maybe the Nazi concentration camp guard, under her/his façade of harshness, has discreetly been compassionate towards the inmates, for instance by dropping an extra loaf of bread in their barracks without permission, without anyone noticing, and without reaping any gratitude in return.	Maybe the 9/11 censor, under her/his façade of harshness, has discreetly been compassionate towards the public, for instance by providing a leak (a statement affirming the 9/11 myth but so outrageous that it hints at the false flag) without anyone noticing and without reaping any gratitude in return.
Should the Nazi concentration camp inmates retaliate against a particular guard, all the guards will feel threatened, close ranks, and tighten their control.	Should the 9/11 truth-seekers retaliate against a particular 9/11 censor, all the censors will feel threatened, close ranks, and tighten their censorship.
A promising line of action for the Nazi concentration camp inmates could be to make one guard understand that (s)he, her/his colleagues and her/his superiors could draw some personal benefit by relaxing their harshness. How to accomplish that is challenging. But mulling revolt and punishment won't do inmates any good.	A promising line of action for 9/11 truth-seekers could be to make one 9/11 censor understand that (s)he, her/his colleagues and her/his superiors could draw some personal benefit by relaxing their censorship. How to accomplish that is challenging. But mulling revolt and punishment won't do the public any good.
At the conclusion of the exercise, the students realize that each Nazi concentration camp guard will have her/his particular valid motivations behind her/his evil deeds, that it is important to contain her/him, that the way to do that is not obvious, and that the promise of retaliation and punishment is possibly immoral and certainly counterproductive.	At the conclusion of the exercise, the reader will realize that each 9/11 censor will have her/his particular valid motivations behind her/his evil deeds, that it is important to contain her/him, that the way to do that is not obvious, and that the promise of retaliation and punishment is possibly immoral and certainly counterproductive.

The parallels between the two situations are evident. They reinforce the global Platonic theater's recurring call to 9/11 truth-seekers to use understanding, compassion and forgiveness as they handle the 9/11 censors.

9/11 truth-seekers have waited a few years to get to this point, where they have on their personal computers, at long last, the tools to confuse the 9/11 censors and expose them to the public for the professional liars they are. 9/11 truth-seekers' next challenge is to refrain from the instinctive call for retaliation that many of them have understandably built over years of frustration, take the high road instead, and use kindness and empathy as they make 9/11 censors bare themselves as con artists and irrelevant leaders.

Here comes a series of helpful tips to engage 9/11 censors:

Find with a high degree of probability that your target is a 9/11 censor (see the relevant sections of the global Platonic theater).
Contact the censor in writing, informing her/him of the baby page and inviting her/him to refute it. If you wish, remind the censor of his/her last instance of 9/11 denial.
Provide your name and even your address, so (s)he does not have the excuse of thinking you may not be real. Do not worry about increasing the risk of retaliation, for if the Platonic Masters highly value the censor, they will quickly identify you, no matter how you try to hide, since they hold sway over just about all the electronic means of communication.
If the censor responds, engage in a discussion.
Stay polite and brief, even if the censor angers you. Remember that you are putting her/him in a lose-lose situation. Unless you make a mistake—or unless the baby page has a defect I did not think of—(s)he knows very well that (s)he risks irremediably losing her/his prestige and will accordingly try to trip you. If you get angry, (s)he will use it as a pretext to cancel further communication and publishing your discussion (see below) will expose you as incapable of a reasoned argument.
Steer the discussion towards the refutation of the baby page's contents. Do not deviate from it. For instance, if the censor alludes to the controlled demolitions, respond that the baby page invites the reader to reaffirm Building 7's official technical report.
Do not boast about unmasking the censor, do not ridicule or demonize her/him. Simply state that you intend to publish your thread. (S)he perfectly understands that you are attempting to force her/him to expose her/himself as hypocritical. Besides, you usually will not be able to completely exclude the possibility that (s)he may simply be misinformed.
Remember that the censor and you are writing in doublespeak. Both of you know very well 9/11's true nature, and both of you know very well that your objective is to ruin her/his credibility. Yet you write as if you were genuinely interested in her/his opinion on the lack of media coverage of the extraordinary official story of Building 7 while (s)he responds as if (s)he genuinely did not understand what you are writing about.
For unmasking high-profile censors is not to the liking of our Platonic Masters—to put it mildly—do not exclude retaliation. Do not count on the internet's anonymity to protect you, for they have deep tentacles within all the internet service providers. Instead, make several trusted people aware of what you are doing, typically by Emailing them copies of your correspondence and letting them know that should something unusual happen to you soon—like getting an offer you can't refuse for a high-paying do-nothing war-profiteering job—, it could be connected to this particular activity. Also, if you experience fear during this exercise, even if it appears to be irrational, consider giving up. Find the proverbial pragmatic middle ground of bravery between the pitfalls of cowardice and temerity.
For whatever use it can be to you, my personal experience as I deal with high-profile censors is that of a moral garbage collector, who feels some mental filth through ridding the Earth of institutionalized mendacity.
Promptly publish the end results of your communication by Emailing them to several trusted people, or preferably by uploading them to a web where they will be accessible to the public. Do not necessarily trust 9/11 Truth outfits to publish your information, for many will disregard it as irrelevant to their mission and some—don't ask me which ones because I do not know—are actually working for the Platonic Masters.
Train yourself on low-profile censors, who won't be as savvy as the professional ones and whose fall will carry less danger to you.
Better still, train yourself with local leaders whom you try to sway on 9/11 (consult the relevant sections of the global Platonic theater). This year 2011 is a great time to do that, for many are planning events to commemorate 9/11's 10^th anniversary. Ask them what they are planning, inform them of the baby page's existence, and invite them to comment on it.
Train yourself on the high-profile censors I practiced on (see below). Ask them to confirm my Email exchanges with them. In the likely case they do not answer, use their silence as a tacit acknowledgement that the baby page is essentially true from their perspective. When a skeptic asks you why so many well-known leaders loathe 9/11-induced policies while so few of them support 9/11 Truth, refer to these threads.
Ask your fellow 9/11 truth-seekers or me for advice.

Following are the results of my first practice runs on leading 9/11 censors. These Email threads unmistakably establish them as either 9/11 censors or intellectually challenged individuals much beyond what is reasonable for university professors or other prominent leaders:

Ted Goertzel is a sociology professor at Rutgers University (New Jersey). His 2011-Jan/Feb article in the Skeptical Inquirer ridiculed conspiracies much less credible than 9/11 and sidestepped a factual description of the very valid reasons to doubt the official 9/11 narrative, summarily rejecting 9/11 Truth and ascribing unflattering thinking patterns to 9/11 truth-seekers in the process. His reaction to the baby page is the standard expectation from a censor, giving the appearance that:
- he first argues against it without reading it, thinking that it is another attack against the official Building 7 story
- when he realizes that the opposite is true and that he is squeezed into a lose-lose corner, he stops communicating
Noam Chomsky is an MIT professor emeritus of linguistics. He is pretty much as liberal as a scholar will get and laments just about every major 9/11-induced activity. Yet he has systematically dismissed 9/11 Truth, as a quick search on YouTube will attest. Chomsky's thread deserves special attention for its possible triplespeak. The reader will recognize the above-mentioned doublespeak, as we both pretend to be reviewing the premises and reasoning of the baby page while we actually try to trip each other over his censorship of 9/11, but there is a distinct possibility that he actually delivers a leak (see the global Platonic theater) and a covert chilling urgent plea to 9/11 truth-seekers as he convincingly writes that he cannot comprehend the trivial engineering component of the baby page. His hidden message could be:

"If the Platonic Masters get their way, everybody will have to comment on the baby page like me. Understanding it will be forbidden. Every human being will have to steadfastly affirm that only highly qualified scientists or engineers can formulate any thought on Building 7's structural failure and that this makes her/him incapable of judging its epistemological consequences. So, please, keep exposing the censorship of Building 7 and 9/11."
This would qualify Chomsky as a 9/11 censor doubling as a 9/11 leaker, and therefore, paradoxically, as another unsung 9/11 hero. This illustrates the paramount need to suspend judgment against a 9/11 censor, no matter how much suffering (s)he may have inflicted.

John Judge is an ultra-liberal icon who used to assist former U.S. representative McKinney. He seems to have a penchant for keeping the Kennedy and King assassination conspiracies alive, which is one of many recipes to distract fringe activists away from the much more promising conspiracy of 9/11. His web devotes a section to the latter, where he blasts the U.S. government for covering up the reality of 9/11 and calls for action to find out more about this cover-up, giving birth to another wedge issue that conveniently pits liberals against conservatives. He peremptorily bases his demonstration of the Pentagon's hit by Flight 77 on a statement by an unnamed flight attendant he personally knows that she visited the crash site and recognized fragments of the airplane and part of the body of a colleague of hers. Most intriguing is the absence of any reference to the undisputable controlled demolitions of the World Trade Center. My short Email exchange with Judge brings a new and ominous perspective to his work: perhaps he is consciously attempting to steer disgruntled liberal activists who are most likely to be receptive to 9/11 Truth away from the most promising topics of 9/11. I did not even need to challenge him with the baby page, for he evidently did not take the trouble to update his 9/11 knowledge to the latest official conspiracy theory. And the angry tone of his communication provides much more useful information than a lengthy discussion.
Several other probable 9/11 censors have not replied to my baby page challenge. I shall list the corresponding threads (monologues of mine) in the near future.

Love,

Dan Noël, 2011-March-19